Guideline-based
intervention to reduce inappropriate telemetry use in a large tertiary centre
Satish Ramkumar1, Edward H. Tsoi1,
Ajay Raghunath2, Floyd F. Dias2, Christopher Li Wai Suen1,
Andrew H. Tsoi2, Darren R. Mansfield1
1) Department of General Medicine, Dandenong
Hospital, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia 2)
School of Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Background:
Inappropriate telemetry use is associated
with reduced patient flow and increased health care costs.
Aims:
To assess if guideline based telemetry
admissions and a daily telemetry ward round is associated with a reduction in inappropriate
telemetry use.
Methods:
A prospective intervention study which included
patients requiring ward based telemetry (under the general medical unit).
Patients were studied in a three-month period preceding intervention(Feb-April
2015) and in a consecutive three-month period following intervention(May-July
2015). Exclusion criteria included intensive care or coronary care admission and
specialty medicine/surgical patients. The intervention consisted of an
admission form which categorised patients based on the American Heart
Association guidelines: telemetry is indicated(class I), maybe indicated(class
II) and not indicated(class III). The second intervention included a daily telemetry
ward round. Telemetry data and medical records were used to obtain patient
demographics as well as identifying clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was
the number of patients admitted with a class III indication (telemetry not
indicated). Secondary endpoints included length of stay and duration of
telemetry.
Results:
74 patients were included pre-intervention (mean±SD
age 73 yrs ±14.9, 57% male) whilst 65 patients were included post-intervention (mean±SD
age 71 yrs ±18.4, 35% male). Apart from more male patients pre-intervention, both
groups had similar baseline characteristics. There was a reduction in class III
admissions post-intervention (11% vs. 38%, p<0.001) and an increase in class
II admissions (71% vs 49%, p=0.01). The intervention was associated with a
reduction in median telemetry duration (1.8±1.8 vs 2.4±2.5 days, p=0.047)
however median length of stay was similar in both groups (5.0±5.0 vs 5.0±6.0
days, p=0.76).
Conclusion:
Guideline based telemetry admissions and a
regular telemetry ward round is associated with a reduction in inappropriate
telemetry use and possibly a reduction in telemetry duration. This may result
in improved patient flow and reduced health care costs.