Nutrition
in Pregnancy: A Northern Territory Provider Perspective
Gehlert JEK1, Jeyaraman K1,
Whitbread C1,2, Kirkham R2, Connors C3, Simmonds A2, O’Dea K4, Maple-Brown LJ1,2
1Department of Endocrinology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin,
Australia
2Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin, Australia
3Top End Health Service, NT Department of Health, Darwin, Australia
4University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Background: Maternal obesity, excessive gestational
weight gain and diabetes are high-risk obstetric complications. The antenatal
period provides an opportunity for nutritional education that may improve
pregnancy outcomes.
Aims: To assess health professionals’ understanding of nutrition in
pregnancy, particularly for women with diabetes, and the utilisation of local
nutrition resources.
Methods: An 11 item questionnaire was distributed to Northern Territory (NT)
health professionals involved in the care of pregnant women. For those who
provide nutritional advice, confidence level was self-reported on a numerical
scale of 1-10. Those who do not provide nutritional advice could include
reasons. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/IC version 14.1.
Results: Eighty-two questionnaires were completed by midwives (47.6%),
medical practitioners (14.6%), diabetes educators (12.2%), nurses (9.8%),
dietitians (8.5%) and Aboriginal health practitioners (2.4%). Eighty-nine
percent provide nutritional information to pregnant women; 75.6% use their
organisation’s recommended resources. The mean confidence rating when
discussing nutritional requirements of pregnancy was 6.3±1.9, with the
majority (87.8%) reasonably confident or more. Those who do not use the
recommended resources reported lack of awareness of such
resources. A similar number of respondents (85.2%) provide
nutritional advice to women who have diabetes in pregnancy, compared
to advice to general pregnant women (89.0%). However, the mean
confidence rating for discussing carbohydrate types and
amounts was lower (5.5±2.3). Sixty-seven percent of respondents
were reasonably confident in providing carbohydrate
education, vs. 87.8% of respondents being confident discussing
general nutritional requirements of pregnancy (p=0.007). Eighty-five
percent discussed weight gain, however, only 53.7% monitor weight each
antenatal visit.
Conclusion: The majority of surveyed NT health
professionals provide nutritional advice to pregnant women and discuss weight
gain, but reported less confidence providing nutritional advice to pregnant
women with diabetes. We are working to improve the availability and access to
culturally appropriate nutrition in pregnancy resources in the NT.